By John Greco
After we verify (or deny) that somebody is familiar with anything, we're creating a price judgment of varieties - we're claiming that there's whatever greater (or inferior) approximately that person's opinion, or their facts, or maybe approximately them. A important activity of the idea of information is to enquire one of these evaluate at factor. this can be the 1st publication to make 'epistemic normativity,' or the normative measurement of information and information ascriptions, its significant concentration. John Greco argues that wisdom is a type of fulfillment, instead of mere fortunate good fortune. This locates wisdom inside a broader, wide-spread normative area. by means of reflecting on our considering and practices during this area, it truly is argued, we achieve perception into what wisdom is and what sort of worth it has for us.
Read Online or Download Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity PDF
Similar epistemology books
Amaral did an exceptional activity of reconstructing Wilfrid Sellars' lectures given in 1975. this isn't just a nice advent to Sellars and his dialectical kind, it's also an outstanding creation to philosophy. there are lots of illustrations (which Sellars really used while teaching), which make the fabric much more available.
This cutting facet number of new and formerly released articles by means of philosophers and social scientists addresses simply what it potential to invoke causal mechanisms, or powers, within the context of supplying a causal rationalization. a special assortment, it deals the reader a number of disciplinary and inter-disciplinary divides, supporting to stake out a brand new, neo-Aristotelian place inside modern debate.
Definite issues, like justice, have impersonal price. different issues, like your mom and dad, hold own values: they've got worth for you. in addition to no matter what worth they've got, they're worthwhile to you. The philosophical literature in addition to non-philosophical literature is inundated with feedback in regards to the forms of factor which are reliable for us or, whether it is a damaging own worth, what's undesirable for us.
This e-book deals a whole survey of latest Soviet idea of information. it's on no account intended to switch De Vries' very good treatise at the related topic. considering De Vries depended customarily at the 'classics of Marxism' and the few modern Soviet works that have been to be had in German translation, his account is at top an in troduction to the modern interval.
- Vom Wissen zur Weisheit: Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre 1811 (Fichte-Studien-Supplementa 20) (Fichte-studien-supplementa)
- Knowledge and Belief (Problems of Philosophy)
- Norms, Naturalism and Epistemology: The Case for Science without Norms
- Bachelard: Science and Objectivity
- John Searle and the Construction of Social Reality
- Hermann Cohen's Critical Idealism (Amsterdam Studies in Jewish Philosophy)
Extra info for Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity
7 of reasons. First, rule theorists in both ethics and epistemology tend to speak in terms of obligation and duty, and so rule-based theories and duty-based theories in both fields tend to overlap. A case in point is Kant’s moral theory, which I here use as a paradigmatic instance of the kind of theory that I am targeting. Second, I am here influenced by Anscombe’s classic paper, cited above, which argues that the close relationship between rule-based theories and duty-based theories is not accidental.
In Section 4 I briefly argue that a virtue-theoretic account can avoid the objections raised against both kinds of deontological theory. Again, a virtue-theoretic account becomes especially attractive in the light of the considerations here raised against deontological theories. 2 T h e a rgu m e n t ag a i ns t w e a k de on t ol o g ic a l t h e or i e s The argument against weak deontological theories claims that etiology is important for knowledge. In other words, in cases of knowledge it matters why one believes what one does.
First, rule theorists in both ethics and epistemology tend to speak in terms of obligation and duty, and so rule-based theories and duty-based theories in both fields tend to overlap. A case in point is Kant’s moral theory, which I here use as a paradigmatic instance of the kind of theory that I am targeting. Second, I am here influenced by Anscombe’s classic paper, cited above, which argues that the close relationship between rule-based theories and duty-based theories is not accidental. Anscombe argues that in moral philosophy the language of duty and obligation is rooted in a conception of ethics that centers on the notion of moral law.