A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of by Gerard O'Grady

Posted by

By Gerard O'Grady

David Brazil's pioneering paintings at the grammar of spoken discourse ended at A Grammar Of Speech (1995) as a result of his premature dying. Gerard O'Grady selections up the baton during this e-book and checks the outline of used language opposed to a spoken corpus. He comprises findings from the decade of corpus linguistics examine, significantly touching on words and lexical goods greater than unmarried orthographic phrases and ellipsis. He demonstrates the additional communicative importance that the incorporation of 2 platforms of intonation ('Key' and 'Termination') carry to the grammar.

O'Grady experiences the literature and covers the idea sooner than relocating directly to a realistic, analytic part. His ultimate bankruptcy studies the arguments, maps the line forward and lays out the sensible purposes of the grammar. The publication can be of significant curiosity to researchers in utilized linguistics, discourse research and in addition EFL/ESL.

Show description

Read or Download A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments PDF

Best grammar books

Dearly, Nearly, Insincerely: What Is An Adverb?

Bursting with adverbs, this addition to the phrases Are CATegorical(tm) sequence creatively clarifies the concept that of adverbs for younger readers with delightfully playful rhymes and very funny illustrations. for simple identity, adverbs are published in colour and key phrases are illustrated on each one web page.

The syntactic licensing of ellipsis

This monograph offers a thought of ellipsis licensing when it comes to Agree and applies it to numerous elliptical phenomena in either English and Dutch. the writer makes major claims: the pinnacle making a choice on the ellipsis web site is checked opposed to the pinnacle licensing ellipsis to ensure that ellipsis to ensue, and ellipsis – i.

Extra info for A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments

Sample text

Indeed, a tone unit by tone unit analysis of the communicative value of the key and termination selections in examples (53) and (54) results in a far less intuitively satisfying analysis. The high key/termination tag in (53) presents the proposition could I as contrary to expectations and invites adjudication. However, the initial mid key/termination has previously labelled the proposition as neither contrary to expectations nor invited adjudication; the communicative values expressed by the key/termination selections are contradictory.

Information that is contrary to expectations is always additive but information that is additive is not always contrary to expectations. This suggests that speakers who wish to invite adjudication may on occasion attach ‘unnecessary, but harmless contrastive implications’ to their utterances. These contrastive implications are presumably harmless because they are overridden by the interlocutors’ appreciation of the existing speaker/hearer state of understanding. Speakers presume that the implications generated by high key are tolerable in situations where hearers are aware that they are inviting adjudication.

The addressee is now invited to adjudicate: ‘. . ’ In (90), [here (54)] there is a high-key choice in the assertion and this gives it a force of a denial that the speaker could go. If he/she stopped at this point, the concord expectation would operate in such a way as to invite the hearer to say whether the denial was justified or not. The speaker evidently does not want his/her assertion to be evaluated in this way, since the mid termination in the tag invites concurrence. In other words, the termination choices in the second and increment-final tone units override the termination choices in the first and increment-initial tone units.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.36 of 5 – based on 20 votes